Authority of the Prosecutor as Single Prosecution System in Criminal Corruption Cases

Guyus Kemal

Abstract


The authority attached to the position of Attorney General as controller of prosecution policy is in accordance with the principle of a single prosecution system, while placing him as the Highest Public Prosecutor in a country. The aim of this research is to examine and analyze (1) the juridical implications of the role of the Prosecutor's Office in eradicating criminal acts of corruption, (2) the presence of a single prosecution system for the Prosecutor's Office in carrying out the prosecution of criminal acts of corruption, (3) the concept of a policy for prosecuting criminal acts of corruption based on the single principle. prosecution system in the future. The approach method used in this research is normative juridical. The results of this research are: (1) The authority of the public prosecutor in handling criminal acts of corruption is regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHAP) and the Indonesian Prosecutor's Law. After the enactment of the Criminal Procedure Code, there was a division into the stages of the prosecutor's duties, namely the pre-prosecution stage and the prosecution stage. However, the KUHAP itself contains these two stages in the Prosecution Chapter, namely in Chapter XV. (2) Ideally, there is a clear separation between criminal justice sub-systems so that there is no phenomenon of overlapping authority between these sub-systems. For example, in the case of corruption prosecutions, there is overlap in prosecutions as regulated by Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission which gives authority to the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) to carry out prosecutions which should be stated in Article 13 of the Criminal Procedure Code that the Public Prosecutor is a prosecutor who is given authority by Law to carry out prosecution. (3) Grammatically, the meaning of sentences based on the applicable criminal procedural law refers to the Criminal Procedure Code, because apart from the Criminal Procedure Code, there are no other criminal procedural laws that apply in Indonesia in general. This is an interpretation that for criminal acts of corruption, prosecution must be carried out according to Articles 137 to 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code by the public prosecutor, in this case by the Prosecutor

Keywords: Prosecutor; Single Prosecution System; Corruption.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adnan Topan Husodo (et. al), 2011, Save KPK Save Indonesia, ICW, Jakarta,

Amirudin Hamzah, 2008, Kebutuhan Surat Dalam Praktik Proses Pidana (Proses Beracara), Mandar Maju, Bandung,

Andi Hamzah dan A. Abidin, 2010, Hukum Pidana Indonesia, Ghalia Indonesia, Jakarta,

Dian Rosita, Kedudukan Kejaksaan Sebagai Pelaksana Kekuasaan Negara Di Bidang Penuntutan Dalam Struktur Ketatanegaraan Indonesia, Jurnal Ius Constituendum, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2018,

Edita Elda, Arah Kebijakan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia: Kajian Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, Vol.1 No.2, 2019.

Edy Suranta Tarigan (et. al), Eksistensi Kewenangan Jaksa Dalam Menentukan Unsur Kerugian Keuangan Negara Sebagai Pembuktian Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review, Vol. 2, Issue 2, 2023,

Egidius Taimenas. Substansi Hukum Perundang-Undangan Harus Dipastikan Bersifat Komprehensif. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2022,

Ermansjah Djaja, 2010, Meredesain Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,

Hutahaean, Armunanto dan Erlyn Indarti, Lembaga Penyidik Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu Di Indonesia, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Volume 16 Nomor 1, Maret 2019,

Irfan Ardiansyah, Pengaruh Disparitas Pemidanaan Terhadap Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Respublica, Vol.17 No. 1, 2017,

Jan. S. Maringka, 2017, Reformasi Kejaksaan Dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta,

Johannes Pasaribu, Peranan Jaksa Terkait Asas Dominus Litis Berdasarkan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia, USU Law Journal, Vol. 6. No. 2, 2018,

Kelik Pramudya dan Ananto Widiatmoko, 2010, Pedoman Etika Profesi Aparat Hukum, Pustaka Yustisia, Jakarta,

Marjono Reksodioutro, 1994, Kriminologi dan Sistem Peradilan Pidana, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta,

Marwan Effendy, 2012, Diskresi Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Makalah, Seminar Nasional Universitas Brawijaya Malang, Malang

Marwan Effendy, 2012, Sistem Peradilan Pidana: Tinjauan Terhadap Beberapa Perkembangan Hukum Pidana, Cetakan ke-1, Referensi, Jakarta,

Miriam Budiardjo, 1977, Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik, Gramedia, Jakarta.

Moh. Hatta, 2010, Kebijakan Politik Kriminal Penegakan Hukum Dalam Rangka Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Pustaka Pelajar, Yogyakarta,

Ook Mufrohim, and Ratna Herawati, Independensi Lembaga Kejaksaan sebagai Legal Structure didalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana (Criminal Justice System) di Indonesia, Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2020,

Qotrun Nida, Yulianah, dan Asep Hasan Sofwan, Disparitas Kewenangan Lembaga Penegak Hukum dalam Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Untirta Civic Education Journal, Vol. 5 No. 2, Desember 2020,

Rainaldy Valentino Kaligis, Implikasi Hukum Atas Revisi Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kpk Terhadap Penyelesaian Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lex Crimen, Vo. 9, No. 1, 2020,

Rangga Trianggara Paonganan, Kewenangan Penuntutan Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi Dan Kejaksaan Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Lex Crimen, Vol.2 No.1, 2013,

Ratna Sari Dewi Polontalo, Independensi Jaksa Sebagai Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia, Lex Crimen, Vol. 7, No. 6, 2018,

Rolando Ritonga. Manifestasi Kewenangan Kejaksaan Dalam Penerapan Denda Damai Dalam Tindak Pidana Ekonomi Guna Mengubah Tatanan Sosial Masyaraka. The Prosecutor Law Review, Vol 1, No. 2, 2023.

Usmaedi (et. al), Membangun Nilai-Nilai Etika Melalui Budaya Lokal Banten Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, Vol. 7, No. 2, 2021,

Yessy Paramita Samadi, Kajian Yuridis Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umumdalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Lex Crimen, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2015,


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.