Implementation of Diversion in Courts to Realize Legal Protection for Children of Narcotics Crimes

Didik Risdiyanto

Abstract


The aim of this research is to analyze current application of diversion in court is to provide legal protection for children who are perpetrators of narcotics crimes and Barriers to implementing diversion in court in providing legal protection for children who are perpetrators of narcotics crimes. This study uses a normative type of research using a case approach and a statute approach. The legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study indicate that Perma Number 4 of 2014 regulates diversion against children whose charges are in the form of subsidiary, cumulative, alternative, or combined, one of which is threatened with under 7 (seven) years in prison. In its implementation, law enforcement, especially investigators and public prosecutors, do not seek diversion using Perma Number 4 of 2014 as a guide in resolving child narcotics crime cases because these regulations only apply in the court environment. In addition, there are differences of opinion among the judges, so that some judges use Perma Number 4 of 2014 as a guideline for implementing diversion in court to realize the protection of children who are perpetrators of narcotics crimes but on the other hand there are also those who do not use it. The conclusion that can be drawn from this writing is that diversion in court based on Perma No. 4 of 2014 has not fully provided legal protection for children, especially perpetrators of narcotics crimes, so the regulation needs further regulation to adjust to the provisions above so that it is not contradictory. Moving on from this, it is necessary to consolidate with other law enforcers so as not to create legal uncertainty and damage the essence of the juvenile criminal justice system.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Agung Nusa Pratidina, Marsella Marsella, Wessy Trisna, Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Pencurian Buah Kelapa Sawit Oleh Anak Di Bawah Umur, Juncto Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Vol 2 No 2, 2020, page 172-180

Dini Hardiany, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam proses Penyidikan Dihubungkan Dengan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Jurnal Hukum Magister Unpas, http://repository.unpas.ac.id/id/eprint/30180,

DS. Dewi Fatahilla dan A.Syukur, Mediasi Penal : penerapan restorative justice di pengadilan anak indonesia, (Indie Pre Publishing, Depok), 2011, page 13.

Erny Herlin Setyorini Sumiati Pinto Utomo, Konsep Keadilan Restoratif Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 16 No 2 Agustus 2020, page 149-159

Evi Aeni Rufaedah. Peranan Pendidikan Agama Dalam Keluarga Terhadap Pembentukan Kepribadian Anak-Anak. Counselia; Jurnal Bimbingan Konseling Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 2020, page 8–25.

Fatiha Anwar Sidiq, P. D., & Saputra, T. Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 5(2), 2024, page 10–23.

http://www.Ditjenpas.go.id/index.php, Data Statistik criminal Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan,

Marlina, Pengantar konsep diversi dan restoratif justice dalam hukum pidana,( USU Press Medan), 2010, page. 1.

N. Novitasari, and N. Rochaeti, "Proses Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak," Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 2021, page. 96-108,

Nashriana, Perlindungan Hukum Pidana Bagi Anak Di Indonesia, PT.Grafindo Persada Indonesia, Jakarta, 2012, page. 1

Neiska Aranafta Nurain, Kesesuaian Syarat Diversi Dengan Konsep Keadilan Restoratif Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak, Recidive jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, Vol 10 No 2, 2021, page 81-89

Pasal 28 B ayat (2) Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi, Prenadamedia Group, Jakarta, 2008, page. 133

Priyadi, Sosialisasi & Roadmap Implementasi UU No. 11 Tahun 2012, diambil dari http://jabar.kemenkumham.go.id/

Ramdani Abd. Hafizh, Legal Protection Against Children Of Narcotics Offenses In The Juvenile Criminal Justice System, Kertha Semaya, Vol 10 No 2 (2022), page 356-370

Resti Pangesti, Subekti, Sinkronisasi Pengaturan Diversi Dalam Memenuhi Hak Anak Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Di Indonesia, Recidive, Vol 10 No 2, 2021, page 117-124

Rika Apriani Minggulina Damanik, Hukum Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Anak Dalam Batasan Usia: Analisis Hukum Pidana Islam dan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012, Al Qanun Jurnal Kajian Sosial dan Hukum Islam, Vol 1 No 3, 2020, page 274-302

Sakka, S. Diversi Dalam Tinjauan Usul Fiqh. MADDIKA : Journal of Islamic Family Law, 3(2), 2022, page. 12–28.

Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamuji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Rajawali, Jakarta, 1985, page. 70

Sukmandari Putri, Ahmad Syaufi, Achmad Faishal, Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Anak yang Berkonflik dengan Hukum Melalui Diversi, JIMPS, Vol 8 No 4, 2023, page 3931-3949

Syafitri, H. N. Anuggrah, P. D. Hulwa, H. A., Saputra, A. & Kamajaya, R. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia. Jurnal Review Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 7(2), 2024, page. 5071–5080


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.